WASHINGTON – US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said he is delaying a key vote on authorising the use of force in Syria to let President Barack Obama publicly address the issue.
Earlier on Monday, the top Obama ally in Congress had scheduled the crucial test vote for Wednesday but then backtracked to let the US leader sell his plan on strikes against the administration of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"I want to make sure the president (makes) his case to the Senate and the American people before voting on this matter," Reid said.
"I don't think we need to see how fast we can do this. We have to see how well we can do this."
Amid deep divisions in Congress over the way forward, and with growing skepticism among Americans about air strikes, Obama meets with Democratic and Republican senators on Tuesday and gives a televised address to the nation that night.
Three polls out Monday, by CNN/ORC International, the Pew Research Center, and the Washington Post/ABC, indicated a strong majority of Americans don't want a congressional resolution to pass, and 63 per cent or more oppose air strikes.
Russia, which has blocked US and British efforts to gain a United Nations resolution approving international action against Syria, appeared to open a path toward a solution on Monday when it suggested a plan for Damascus to hand over its chemical weapons.
Obama called the plan "potentially positive," and hinted at congressional delays as his administration weighs Moscow's comments.
"I don't anticipate that you would see a succession of votes this week or anytime in the immediate future," Obama told ABC News.
His fellow Democrat, Senator Chris Coons, credited Obama's strike threat for helping prompt the Russian proposal, calling it "a welcome change" in Russian policy.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee member said he would work with fellow lawmakers on a plan that "allows both diplomacy and continued pressure".
Should there be objections to the motion, as at least one Republican senator threatened last week, the 100-member chamber would need 60 votes to move forward.
Obama's Democrats control the Senate, but it is unclear whether the president has the necessary support to meet the 60-vote threshold.
At least three lawmakers who had been among the many in the undecided column announced on Monday they would oppose the move to authorise the use of force.
"After step A, what will be steps B, C, D and E?" veteran Republican Senator Lamar Alexander told his constituents.
"I see too much risk that the strike will do more harm than good by setting off a chain of consequences that could involve American fighting men and women in another long-term Middle East conflict."
The Senate resolution now being considered forbids US boots on the ground in Syria for combat purposes, but several war-weary lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have voiced concern that a strike would still draw the United States deeper into a Mideast military entanglement.
First-term Senate Democrat Heidi Heitkamp said she and Senator Joe Manchin, another Democrat who has voiced deep skepticism about Obama's plans, were drafting "an alternative approach" that would give Assad 45 days to sign an international chemical weapons ban and start turning over such poison gas.
Approval of Obama's plan may be tougher in the Republican-held House of Representatives, where far more lawmakers have spoken out in opposition of the strikes than in favor.
Democrat Tulsi Gabbard from Hawaii was among them, saying in a statement Monday evening US military action in Syria would be "a tragedy and serious mistake." AFP